Many studies show the direct correlation of project success (mostly measured as being on time, budget and delivering the expected quality) and the application of a comprehensive Project Management Standard. A study by Robert Joslin (Skema Business School, Lille campus, Avenue Willy Brandt, Lille, 59777, France) and Ralf Müller (Norwegian Business School, Nydalsveien 37, 0484 Oslo, Norway) titled “Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts”, published in the International Journal of Project Management Volume 34, Issue 4, May 01, 2016, Pages 613-626, states
“….. that the application of a PMM (Project Management Method) account for 22.3% of the variation in project success, and PMMs that are considered sufficiently comprehensive to manage the project lead to higher levels of project success than PMMs that need to be supplemented for use by the project manager”.
Assessments can deliver answers to many questions and shorten the time for integrating an optimal project management environment which will enable improved meeting of strategic objectives.
Profeo has developed 3 sequentiel assessments to answer these and other questions
Assessment | Deliverables | Scope |
---|---|---|
Basic | Overview of current capabilities with regards to project, programme, and project portfolio managements and important aspects of them. Benchmarking |
|
Analysis | Completion of the analysis to include those aspects not covered by the basic assessment Detailed current capabilities, strengths and weaknesses |
|
Diagnosis | Potential causes and solutions Required capabilities |
|
Our assessment method was developed by Profeo Ltd. and was based on various assessment standards (such as CMMI®, P3M3®, OPM3®, SPICE®)